A perfect sacramental storm has begun to brew in the
Episcopal Church. The various fronts are all meandering towards General
Convention where we will discuss, and hopefully reach a resolution, on the
issue of full sacramental marriage equality in the church. Meanwhile,
however, a local storm is brewing off the coat of Florida, where over the past
week the leadership at the Cathedral Church of St. Luke in Orlando sought to
reschedule an infant’s baptism on account of his two fathers. As some are battening down the hatches and others hoping to surf the waves, I find myself
reflecting on how this reveals the heart of sacramental theology.
The issue is that sacramental marriage equality is not the
same thing as civil marriage equality. The writing of one’s name into the Book
of Life at baptism is not the same thing as getting your name in the county
records at birth. In cases of civil marriage and one’s name in the county
records one is dealing with a situation where the primary reality is that of individual rights and freedoms. There is a corporate reality to it when it comes to access of services, and any undocumented worker or couple seeking the rights and privileges of marriage can fully explain how necessary that corporate reality is, but the argument and focus is on the rights of the individual in pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness.
The sacraments of marriage and baptism are different creatures. They are corporate affairs of the Body of Christ. Though the arguments towards respecting the dignity of the individuals involved is an inherent one to our baptismal covenant it is, indeed, a secondary one. When approaching why it is that we should recognize the sacramental nature of an individual in baptism or a couple in marriage the onus of the argument is that of the community recognizing God in their midst present in such. To be clear the sacraments in these cases are about the revealing of the already existing Truth within the individuals to the community of believers for the sake of transforming the community. This is hallowing, the transforming process of sanctification.
In Baptism the community is transformed in the revelation that a member that it did not know was keenly missing is found. In Sacramental Marriage the community recognizes the outpouring of Gods grace within a couple so that they are known as an Icon of the greatest commandment, to love your neighbor as yourself. The community is then called upon to be transformed by these revelations and to consistently support the individuals involved such that they remember that which they are known to be.
The sacraments of marriage and baptism are different creatures. They are corporate affairs of the Body of Christ. Though the arguments towards respecting the dignity of the individuals involved is an inherent one to our baptismal covenant it is, indeed, a secondary one. When approaching why it is that we should recognize the sacramental nature of an individual in baptism or a couple in marriage the onus of the argument is that of the community recognizing God in their midst present in such. To be clear the sacraments in these cases are about the revealing of the already existing Truth within the individuals to the community of believers for the sake of transforming the community. This is hallowing, the transforming process of sanctification.
In Baptism the community is transformed in the revelation that a member that it did not know was keenly missing is found. In Sacramental Marriage the community recognizes the outpouring of Gods grace within a couple so that they are known as an Icon of the greatest commandment, to love your neighbor as yourself. The community is then called upon to be transformed by these revelations and to consistently support the individuals involved such that they remember that which they are known to be.
The issue that arises is what happens when a community
cannot handle the revelation of such an Icon in their midst. This is the
earliest of Christian controversies. What occurs when a woman, or a slave, or
an uncircumcised proclaims Christ Crucified and names themselves, to a group of
freed circumcised men to be an equal part of the Body of Christ. The answer is
chaos, strife, argumentation, the breaking apart of the accepted societal norms
that were maintaining the peaceful running of the community. Our call as
Christian community, however, is to enter into this place of contention and
work its way out. To break the rules, as the Episcopal Church is want to do,
first and figure out how the Holy Spirit makes it work later. The strife of a
community grappling to recognize an unknown revelation of Christ’s love is
inherently preferred over the strife that occurs when a community refuses to
grapple with the proclamation of Christ Crucified from those it deems unworthy
so to do. The onus of the other’s cross, the burden of strife, should always be
taken up by the Christian community and never placed upon those seeking to
bring a new revelation of Christ’s love.
Gamaliel’s wisdom to the Jewish elders about Christianity holds true to this day for the church. When we hear those proclaiming Christ Crucified we must not burden or silence them but allow them to be for “if this plan or this undertaking is of human origin, it will fail; but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them-in that case you may be found fighting against God!”. (Acts 5:38b-39) The reality is that the Episcopal church has spent over half a century observing the proclamation of Christ Crucified by the LGBTQ+ community within and outside its midst. During that time we have had radical moves of welcome, when St. George’s Episcopal, New Orleans, was the only church to open its doors for a memorial service after the UpStairs Lounge Arson in June of 1973, to the more common acts of rejection such as the recent resending of a baptismal date at the Cathedral in Orlando. What we have found, again and again, is that Christ is with us in the midst of being transformed by the proclamation of Christ Crucified by members of the LGBTQ+ community.
Gamaliel’s wisdom to the Jewish elders about Christianity holds true to this day for the church. When we hear those proclaiming Christ Crucified we must not burden or silence them but allow them to be for “if this plan or this undertaking is of human origin, it will fail; but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them-in that case you may be found fighting against God!”. (Acts 5:38b-39) The reality is that the Episcopal church has spent over half a century observing the proclamation of Christ Crucified by the LGBTQ+ community within and outside its midst. During that time we have had radical moves of welcome, when St. George’s Episcopal, New Orleans, was the only church to open its doors for a memorial service after the UpStairs Lounge Arson in June of 1973, to the more common acts of rejection such as the recent resending of a baptismal date at the Cathedral in Orlando. What we have found, again and again, is that Christ is with us in the midst of being transformed by the proclamation of Christ Crucified by members of the LGBTQ+ community.
The messiness of the situation, the strife, the pain is not going to go away anytime soon... what we will be deciding is wether we as a church are willing to take up that messiness, that strife, that pain together as one Body in Christ or will we enter into full Proclamation of Christ Crucified with our LGBTQ+ members... or will we continue to persecute in oh so many ways those in the LGBTQ+ community who wish to proclaim Christ Crucified in our midst and in so doing place the onus of the mess, the strife, the pain upon them. My continued prayer is that come July we will be one Body in Christ proclaiming Christ Crucified, sharing our mess, our pain, our strife together as one in a great act of hallowing each other into the new heaven and new earth.
I know my profession leads to very black & white thinking, but it seems to me we have to decide if we're following Christ the Messiah, or Saul of Tarsus, Pharisee and son of a Pharisee. There is quite a lot of overlap between the two, but Paul, or whoever wrote many of the screeds attributed to Paul, wasn't on board with all of the teachings of Christ. Or so it seems to me. Of course I could be wrong...
ReplyDelete